Tuesday, 8 November 2016

Get the sewerage out of the river!

Doug Wilkinson { Examiner 15 } and M . Seward { Nov. 3rd. } both make some valid points re. Tamar River sewage and silt problems. 

In 1992 I retired from L.C.C and the secondary plant was started and installed around 1993 at Ti –Tree Bend. 

Unfortunately L.C.C did not continue the upgrade to tertiary treatment level. 

Sheer neglect , and wrong priorities has resulted in a cost for Tas – Water { tertiary } $ 400 million , and council to find the $110 million to replace combined sewage and water pipes in front of proposed new Utas University at York Park move. 

Should silt be removed {$ 7.Million dollar state of the art dredge } and used to beautify banks of river it would make way for pleasure boats to take tourists on a river cruise , calling into wineries for meals , fishing,swimming,barbecue,weddings, you name it even cruises to Bridport and Flinders Island. 

I estimate 200,000 tourists a year would enjoy this experience , together with our beautiful Gorge walk and J .C development and Royal Park stroll. 

It is Launceston,s dream begging to go , but where our Aldermen L.C.C , Tourist Department , Chamber of Commerce , State and Federal Govt. members. 

 Action please. : get you elevators working. 

 Basil J. Fitch

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is a matter that needs the attention and commitment of the Mayor and Aldermen rather than the operational component of Council. Hand balling this kind of issue to 'the staff' is just not on if ratepayers are to get "value from their representatives". There are innovative solutions out there and one or two might fit The Tamar. On the evidence the required experts are not in-house but they may be 'in the community' if it was a proposition supported by the aldermen to ask. It is time for a change in the way problems are solved. If not the risk is more problems will go on being created.

TRANSCRIPT: A Professor, a General Manager and a Mayor

FOREWORD: This interview was recorded live on Facebook, on Saturday afternoon 22 October 2016 at approximately 2.30 pm. After the announcement in the Examiner newspaper on Saturday about the university’s secret sponsorship deal with the Launceston City Manager and the Mayor, there were more than 280 comments and many more replies on the Examiner’s Facebook page. The Examiner reporter interviews:
•  the University of Tasmania’s Mike Calford, 
•  the Launceston Mayor, Albert van Zetten and 
•  the Launceston City general manager, Robert Dobrzynski, 

The interview itself drew another 87 comments and many more replies. The best parts of the video are the questions by the interviewer and the real time comments from viewers. (The video can be seen at the Examiner Launceston Facebook page, click Videos, “City of Launceston Official – the University of…” ) 

THE INTERVIEW: (complete with ums, ahs, ers and repeats. Underlined words are to show the emphasis made by the speaker) 

Calford: Er, Mike Calford, I’m the provost at the University and this is a great outcome. Ah, we’re working hand in hand with the Launceston City Council in many ways, as we bring about a transformation of education in the north of the state. And it’s wonderful to be able to put our name up early on this site, and also to do something really positive for the community. It er helps us, er, we’re putting something back in and we’re getting a lot from it too, because interstate marketing is an important aspect for the university. The university can’t survive just on the Tasmanian student numbers, there just aren’t enough. We’re bringing international students – about 850 international students currently in Launceston and a number of interstate students – not quite that number; we’d like to increase that number and getting our name well-known, well-understood early on, with potential students interstate is a great marketing outcome for us. 

van Zetten: Yes, so, look from a Council perspective we’re absolutely excited, and thank you to the university, the Utas for doing this sponsorship, for doing this sponsorship, and this, this, this facility here is regarded as one of the best in Australia, there’s no doubt about that and we know that when hawthorn come and play here they absolutely love the surface and they love playing here and they have adopted this as their home. So, we see this as a good mix as Mike has said very much so, we’ve, er, education being so important for Launceston and to grow, and we wanna see more people get involved in education locally and hopefully then people will come over from the mainland and specially when with the university now with the move to Inveresk is gunna to be extremely exciting for this whole precinct and, er, the extra programs that they are gunna to be looking at, and especially the ones to do with, relevant areas here in agriculture and relevant to Launceston or the surrounds of Launceston and this is not just about Launceston bur northern Tasmania, and even Tasmania, and we’re hoping, or I’m hoping, very much that people from the mainland who see that will also get to know a little bit about, about Utas and hopefully come to Launceston.” 

Dobrzynski: Ah, Robert Dobrynski, general manager of the City of Launceston. Look, it is an extremely exciting announcement um, we have one of the pre-eminent organisations in Tasmania, um, entering into a partnership with the largest council in Tasmania, the City of Launceston, From an operational point of view we see tremendous potential moving forward with the inner city campus being constructed, ah, adjacent to, to this stadium, ahm, that we can, um partner and take our partnership even further in terms of use of the facility and in terms of the development of the facility. So its extremely exciting, um, The university’s essentially contributing financially to the operation of the premiere sporting facility in Tasmania. It gives them enormous exposure in terms of national, and international, markets because certainly AFL games are streamed live overseas, so it provides some really strong mutual, er mutually beneficial outcomes we believe.” 

Interviewer: What are some extra details about the sponsorship deal in terms of what each party is getting? 

Dobrzynski: Well it’s a five year sponsorship deal, um, and it, um, it provides exposure to the university and in terms of signage, in terms of activities that they’ll be able to undertake at the facilities here at the stadium, um, and it also enables us to continue a dialogue on, as I said earlier, how ah, the university and the stadium can, um, um, partner to provide services to the community, not only to the student community but also to the community of, of northern Tasmania. 

Interviewer: Is there any information, about exactly how much the sponsorship deal in terms, of dollars terms? .

Dobrzynski: Well, it’s significant enough for the mayor and I to be extremely excited, but, um, clearly that’s a commercial in confidence information and it’s not information that we’ve released in the past publicly, um, and um, it’s probably be inappropriate that we do so now. 

Interviewer: Were there a number of other sponsors being considered or was the university the only one? 

Dobrzynski: Look, um, there are difficult commercial circumstances in Tasmania at the moment and we find that corporate sponsorship is difficult to get so we were particularly excited to get such a good fit as the University of Tasmania interested in sponsoring the stadium. 

Interviewer: Um, there’s been a bit of criticism of the Council’s – I speak…excuse me…I speak specifically um of the um, on the Danny Gibson Facebook post where he’s said that aldermen were only informed by about 5.23 pm via email of the deal and weren’t told anything prior to that. What’s your response? 

Dobrzynski: Look, it’s disappointing that such a grand announcement is perhaps being hijacked by social media posts. Um, the aldermen are briefed thoroughly in terms of operational, er, in terms of policy and strategic matters, um, in order that they can make decisions on those areas, they are the statutory responsibilities of elected members and the council. Operational responsibility falls exclusively to the General manager and we have an organisation that’s over 100 million dollar budget over 500 million, er, 500 employees and one point four five billion dollars worth of assets and it’s just simply not practical for aldermen to be involved in the operational activities of the council and indeed the code of conduct for aldermen explicitly (RD’s emphasis) excludes aldermen being involved in operational matters, so, um, um, the system works well, ah, um, on occasions we have hiccups.” 

Interviewer: Do you think that there should have been um, that potentially, that consultation with aldermen before it was announced, um, by, you know, in the media, so given that the Utas move has been such a sensitive issue for some members of the community? 

Dobrzynski: Well, the aldermen were certainly strongly supportive of the, the university’s move inner city campus project and, um, I understand the vote was, as I recall, ah, for the move. We’re in continued discussions with the university at an operational level and at a policy and strategic level. Any of those matters that require council decisions from the legislative point of view under the Local Government Act, aldermen are thoroughly briefed on in order that they can take those decisions fully informed. 

Over 90 per cent of the comments oppose the sponsorship and/or the name change to the university name. Where are the funds coming from etc etc. The video and real time comments can be seen at the Examiner’s facebook page under videos.

Monday, 7 November 2016

Letter to editor ... on Launceston City Council and accountability


Basil J Fitch 06.11.16 

Front page Examiner Saturday October 15th. censured Launceston City Council Manager Robert Dobernysky Mayor Albert Van –Zetten UTas Mike Calford announces sponsorship and naming rights for York Park (University of Tasmania ). 

This deal was done without any consultation with the elected Aldermen . 

At question time L.C.C meeting 17th. October I had to ask City Manager 3 times to get an answer , who authorised deal with Utas. 

City Manager response was he did under 62 Local Government Act , which reads functions and powers of General Manager . 

• 62-1g To liaise with Mayor on affairs of the council and performance of its functions. 
•  62-2 General Manager may do anything necessary or convenient to perform his/or her functions under this or any act. 

The City Manager has more power than the elected 12 Aldermen. 

I also asked City Manager what financial agreement had been reached with Utas, his reply commercial in confidence. 

Ratepayers in all municipalities of the state can know understand why there is so much conflict and friction state wide with councils . 

All councils are riddled with restrictions, such as operational (Alderman can not discuss) code of conduct (break rules) mediation (on track) counselling (behaviour) call police and heaps more. 

Local Government Minister Peter Gutwein should abolish 1993 flawed Local Government Act immediately and implement amalgamation through regional councils North – South – North West, using proven New Zealand model as a base. 



See more at: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php?/pr-article/letter-to-editor-...-on-launceston-city-council/#sthash.Orfu7RIK.dpuf

EDITOR'S NOTE: Basil Fitch served 11 years as an alderman and councillor on St. Leonards and Launceston Councils. During that time he was part of a research team investigating Local Governance in New Zealand. He has served on many council committees and has maintained an active interest in local governance affairs since his retirement from Launceston's Council in 1992. 

LOCAL GOVT ACT
SECTIONS  62  Click Here & 65 Click Here

Monday, 31 October 2016

AURORA STADIUM NAME CHANGE??



Aurora Stadium
I WONDER how many Launcestonians are aware that our footy ground on Invermay Road on Invermay Round has an official title that goes back to 1901?

That name still stands today it is York Park, named after the Duke of York after his visit to Tasmania.

Are we disrespecting his memory by using an alternate commercial name and ignoring the history of this site?

My understanding is that as he was the Duke of York and Cornwall, that was the reason for Cornwall Square being so named.

We have now denigrated Cornwall Square by selling off part of it for 30 pieces of silver, or maybe a bit more, we’ve done the same to York Park, this is the second time as it’s now Aurora Stadium.

Perhaps our fly-in, fly-out general manager who appears to have more power than our aldermen would consider selling off the Town Hall, Albert Hall and the Cenotaph and leasing them back?

Ron Baines, Kings Meadows.



Saturday, 29 October 2016

Citizen Juries Are Working Right Now

The newDEMOCRACY Foundation Day three of the Nuclear Citizens' Jury in Adelaide. Jurors hearing from 32 witnesses that they chose. This YOUtube video provides an insight into how Citizen’s Juries work and are working [LINK] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5-KegQKmSE
If you want to know more about what citizens' juries are and how they work? Why not listen to nDF Board member, Professor Carson, being interviewed on Real Democracy Now! a podcast (episode 1.1). This podcast is hosted by one of the newDEMOCRACY Foundation’s very own volunteers and is available through iTunes [LINK]– https://itunes.apple.com/au/podcast/real-democracy-now!-a-podcast/id1164312350?mt=2]


Wednesday, 26 October 2016

IT'S TIME .... time to rethink and reimagine local governance in Tasmania

Emmanuel Macron is a high official investment banker and politician French, born in Amiens 1977. 

Macron is a technocrat, tax inspector and an investment banker at Rothschild & C  before being appointed Deputy General Secretary of the Presidency of the Republic with François Hollande 2012 to 2014 . 

He was appointed Minister of Economy Industry and Numeric in the government Manuel Valls II inAugust 2014. Having been a member of the Socialist Party between 2006 and 2009 , he founded the movement “En Marche!”, or “Forward!” [LINK].

Macron resigned from his ministerial duties in August 2016.

Emmanuel Macron was Montebourg’s successor as Minister of the Economy and possibly a presidential candidate in 2017. Macron has his own proposal for creating an allotted supervisory body ... the creation of a citizens’ commission . 

Macron may have earned a degree in philosophy at one of Paris' top universities, but there is nothing grande école about his manner. In our social-media age of "real" politicians, he appears the epitome of authenticity.... [LINK]

Each year, the president of the Republic has to appear before a citizens’ commission – [citizens' assembly/jury - LINK]  –  to be held to account, possibly supported by the Court of Audit. Macron envisages the possibility of using allotment. This would allow the recreation of a little “political hygiene” in the system. For creating a democratic debate “which does not exist today”.

"He speaks his mind, but he does so in an elegant way. He is talented and business- oriented. The country needs someone like him to embody innovation and to give it a face."
So Macron may indeed be what one commentator calls the "missing link", that reassuring yet revolutionary insider/outsider able to connect all of France's fabulous assets. But it's not entirely clear that even Macron's pin-up looks and charisma will be enough to genuinely transform France into Start-Up Nation 2.0.
Back in June TIME ran a story "Emmanuel Macron Has Big Plans for France. Is It Ready for Them?" that reported that when Macron visited the small driving school in Montreuil the owner handed him a boxed gift. Inside lay a sculpture of the literary character Don Quixote, the self-styled knight who fights for impossibly noble ideals. Macron laughed as he picked it up. “We need people who dream impossible things,” he said, “who maybe fail, sometimes succeed, but in any case who have that ambition.” 

Macron’s dreams of becoming France's next President – and  brining about fundament change – no longer seems impossible. So, if Macron can dream of fundamental change why not entertain such change in Tasmania – and sooner rather than later?

Tasmania's Local Govt Act 1993 is well past its use-by-date, its flawed in a 21st C context and its provisions are open to governance without accountability. Quite simply, on the evidence the 'system' is broken and dysfunctional. Tasmania has often been used as a kind of 'social laboratory' and very often with positive outcomes. 

Rather that 'stick like a load'a krap' to an outmoded and klapped-out local governance system its time to embrace change. It's time to start a really serious conversation about effecting real change and right now.

Watch this space!
CLICK HERE TO GO TO SOURCE

Sunday, 23 October 2016

The foolishness of asking the wrong questions Minister Gutwein

CLICK HERE FOR THE MERCURY STORY
Eva Ruzicka is out there on FACEBOOK asking about the idea of, and  the new emerging  myths to do with  "strategic capability". She also thinks that "Mayor Tony Foster hit it on the head by pointing to economist in pin striped suits."

She is asking Minister Gutwein, why he is so afraid to have a real conversation aimed at sorting out what is the reality of state government responsibilities.

Indeed she is on the money in asking about the capacity local government to maintain Tasmania's "increasingly frayed social fabric." 

The notion that the State should, as she says "actually [be] taking financial responsibility for whole of state services that in this day and age" is, it seems to her viable. OTher think the model is broken.

Likewise she seems to think that Tasmania's 29 Councils are best suited to delivering the required services.  But are they?

Mayor Foster might, as Eva Ruzicka says, be right about his pin striped suited 'economists'  but it seems that they are being asked to answer the wrong questions. The question that really needs asking is to do with the model's viable – a 20th Century model – and up to the task in the 21st Century for a population of something over half a million souls? 

Having asked that we then need to look around us and ask ourselves is this model standing up to the rigours of time. The evidence seems to pointing to it not being so. 

Stuart Bryce it seems thinks "that there's some merit in trashing councils [given] the latest scrap at LCC [Launceston Council] it seems that in certain "operational" circumstances, alderman are redundant." Most of the people who vote in council elections imagine that the are voting for representatives – not a bit of it in Launceston it appears.

Just look at all the nonsense that Ald. Danny Gibson is being exposed to and that it all alerts us to in regard to the renaming of the Aurora Stadium and the "support" for the North East Rail Trail by LCC. As Stuart Bryce says on FACEBOOK nothing "heard in Council [of] either of those decisions."

As George Burrows points out to Stuart Bryce "your lot [Launcestonians] are just beginners compared to Huonville and Glenorchy, but I must say you seem to be learning fast."

Social media is telling those who use it quite a bit and the press is telling us nothing of real interest.

If Minister Gutwein is not looking around himself and observing the unraveling of the 'local governance rope' one wonders whose lent him their rose coloured glasses and in order not to se what.

It hardly seems credible that the case for an open and independent inquiry involving 'the public' actually needs to be put to the Minister given all that's revealing itself. But it seems that it does!

About now if we were not having all-in-all-out four year term councils we'd be having elections - rather just had one. Councilors and aldermen would as likely as not be on much better behavior and the inevitability of facing local governance's dysfunction might just have been prolonged. But it seems that the dysfunction must be faced now.

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Bad Planning Proposal Stopped!


Launceston Council's Lindsay Street Carpark proposal is now off the agenda.  
What would have happened if not enough people took on the council and ensured that they had their voiced herd. This is one of those projects that cause rates to go up and up if they are not stopped!

SEE THE TASMANIAN RATEPATERS SITE 

PUBLIC MEETING: Statewide Planning Scheme

The Hodgman Government is 'reforming' Tasmania's planning laws to make it easier for developers to gain approvals by weakening protections, watering down assessment rigor and winding back public engagement and opportunities to appeal.
 
This is complex, detailed and happening right now.
 
One day it will affect you; when a development is built in your favourite national park or reserve, when apartments are built overshadowing your backyard or the character and amenity of you neighbourhood is altered for good.
 

Find out more at an upcoming public meeting.
 
Date      Tues 8 Nov 2016 (World Planning Day)

Time     1.10 pm – 2 pm

Venue    Hobart Town Hall, 50 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania



Speakers to include Michael Buxton Professor of Environment and Planning at the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University.
 
More speakers to be announced soon.