Friday, 26 March 2021

Is Janie Finlay Independent or is she looking for somewhere to swing to?

 


Rumours are flowing thick and fast and why wouldn't they be? Councillor Janie Finlay, an ex-mayor for the City of Launceston and recently an independent candidate for Rosevears in the Legislative Council, and now an 'advisor' to the Tasmanian Labour Party, is now looking like she'll be taking a shot Bass for Labor. 

Are you confused? That's us talking to you readers but yes indeed we could be asking Janie. It is all very confusing but hey these days politics is a career and one must take one's chances where one finds them. 

Apparently Janie is going around the traps to see what's there in the way of support. Is it on the wane or is it holding? If she stands, she'll discover all that yet again on May 1.

Speculation aside lets throw a couple of ideas about that she might like to consider. A good place to start would be what the State government could and should be to do with Local Government. Janie could be quizzed quite intensely given the generally poor state of affairs in local governance in both Launceston and Tasmania generally and her direct hands on experience. In fact, she is consistent mover and seconder on a vast array of agenda items.

Janie Finlay is not short on opinions on the full spectrum of issues and she is always there with the winning team even at the most contentious times. If she has ever voted against anything its nothing that stands out in the community she represents and that seems extraordinary.

In any case, it'd be an imperative for Janie Finlay to now do a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats test for local governance in Tasmania – given her expertise. She has wide experience and by now she will know where the bodies are buried but will she tell us or rather those whom she hopes to persuade to vote for her as a Labor candidate.

Janie Finlay as a candidate for Bass might be inclined to discuss local governance's transparency and accountability and perhaps even call a community hall meeting on the topic. There would be a crowd, COVID-19 notwithstanding, ready and willing to listen to her in the company of all the alternative candidates. 

Janie Finlay as a candidate for Bass might also be inclined to speak on 'women's issues' along with the cultural diversity of communities in Tasmania. She might well be able to articulate what employment opportunities she envisages for Tasmania in the short, medium and longer term in the State.

Janie Finlay as a candidate for almost anything can talk on almost anything but this time round she'll need to deliver more than platitudes and unfulfillable parish pump promises. But we are jumping the gun and assuming that she will be a candidate and its the Labor Party that needs to decide who they are going to back in this very winnable State Government election.


Wednesday, 24 March 2021

WHAT LAUNCESTON PEOPLE CANNOT EXPECT

  • Expect a councillor to take a phone call or call you back.
  • Expect to get to speak to someone with the information you need if you phone the reception desk.
  • Expect the council to contain expenditure and keep rates and charges in line with a economic norm.
  • Expect the council to give local business a fair chance to tender for council work.
  • Expect the council to complete a project on time and on budget.
  • Expect the council to consult with residents on anything that they do.
  • Expect the council to meet environmental standards that take account climate change.
  • Expect the council to work with community to develop their streets,  roadways and maintain verges.
  • Expect the council to work with small businesses to enable to grow and generate employment.
  • Expect the councillors to pay any attention to ordinary people to live more comforably and develop their neighbouhood.
  • Expect either a council officer or councillor to pay any attention to  their needss as residents or business people.\
And ask almost anyone and you will find other things to add to the list.  The city gets the council it gets because the residents just cannot see a way ahead with the kind of administration the city has and that keeps the elected representatives in the dark.

THE VALUE OF URBAN TREES


IF one man can do this what might a city do over and above what it currently does? 

This could also be imagined as ‘development’  ... A development at least? 

IF this can be achieved in Hong Kong what could be done with unloved trees in Launceston? 

What can be made from one tree, any tree? This could also be imagined as ‘cultural development’ ?

 A 100 designer makers could be asked the question could they not?

Developers building new homes in certain areas across Adelaide must replace every tree lost due to construction, or pay up to $1200 per removed tree, under a proposed new State Government scheme. The draft plan, which will be signed off in late February, aims to encourage tree planting and reduce canopy loss in urban residential areas. It will apply in zones outlined in the proposed Planning and Design Code, including in Housing Diversity Neighbourhood, Urban Renewal Neighbourhood and City Living Zones.

LINKS TO DOCUMENTATION [1] • [2] •  [3]


The payment of, or the receipt of, fees or dues does not by necessity determine the ‘membership’ of a Community of Ownership & Interest (COI) of an institution, those who do pay fees and/or are in receipt of salaries, wages, honorariums, retainers etc. relative to the institution will typically be COI members – but not by definition or exclusively. A fee may be required for some reason to be a member of an auxiliary or affiliated group but this does not rank a membership in any way given that individuals will often have a diversity of parallel and/or coexisting ownerships and interests. COI members may also be members of affiliated and connected groups, organisations and institutions.



Mainstream ecological sustainability into development strategies 
Rather than falling back on existing approaches to ecological sustainability LOCAL GOVERNANCE should reflect a transformed mindset and a novel economic strategy  On September 25, 2015, the world celebrated the adoption of the United Nations resolution “Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. The agenda comprises 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) with 169 associated targets. Since governments of all UN member states are committed to the agenda, in theory at least there is international consensus on a new philosophy of development, representing a major departure from long prevalent orthodoxy.

Sunday, 7 March 2021

Brian Wightman Calls It Like Its Not This Sunday

 


ISSUE: Launceston should learn to understand the mud, but it will never be love, writes Brian Wightman

Tamar River/kanamaluka is not actually a river. Rather it is a tidal estuary covering 68 kilometres and entering Bass Strait at Low Head. On one day there are protests and "fix the mud" signs decrying the accumulation, coupled with a teenager being rescued from the Head of the River after becoming stuck, while the next there is frivolity at the Cataract Gorge as swimmers take to the Basin, a dolphin (albeit sick) is swimming in the North Esk River, and there is a picturesque full tide on sunset. [ OMG what is this stuff?] ...................... RELATED: A Tasmanian city stuck in the mud, but what can be done? 
Learn to "love the mud" is an answer if the estuary was not the economic lifeblood of the city. For amenity and to support development, businesses, and recreation providers who we have encouraged to invest, the state and federal governments must reinstate a dredging program as a community service [ BLOODY HELL who will pay for this and what with ONLY 'the community' now via rates and taxes GET REAL]....................... Frankly, learn to love the mud is akin to saying learn to love the cold should the City of Launceston council decide to stop heating the regional aquatic centre because it is too expensive [What rubbish and apparently this man has a university education]....................... The banks of the Tamar Yacht Basin at Home Point, the meeting of the North and South Esk, is the most contentious confluence of the river where activities such as hospitality, sport and recreation, tourism, industry, and boat mooring are established.[ Because a poor decision was made by the colonials and people have built on it, stupidly, why do people now have to pay for all those mistakes]...................... The Tamar River/kanamaluka is also a conservation area managed by the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service, therefore requiring a permit to undertake any mitigation works. This requirement is completely appropriate [ OMG we are now on the other side of the argument]....................... To explain the challenges that we continue to face in simple terms: the estuary, like a blocked toilet, cannot fully flush. [ Bad metaphor but there we go ]...................... RELATED: How the Tamar became polluted and what is being done to fix it...................... By comparison, the Derwent River/timtumili minanya stretching from Lake St Clair to Storm Bay is 239 kilometres long and deep.[ SO??? what;'s the point??]...................... It incorporates a five-and-a-half wide kilometre estuary, home to our state's capital city, Hobart, before emptying into the Tasman Sea. Hobart is just 19 kilometres from the river mouth and on an outgoing tide flushes the Derwent River. As a result, it is often a gentle reminder in jest that in 1798 during colonisation Bass and Flinders should have established the base at George Town when they moored. [ OMG who/what informs this stuff??] ..........RELATED: Chamber calls for independent body to oversee river cleanup...................... Our river is further complicated by the fact that the silt as it is commonly known is acid sulphate soil. In situ, or when not exposed to air, the silt presents no risks. However, when exposed to oxygen, the iron sulfides react and create sulphuric acid, which can kill marine life up and down the estuary. Confused? [ YES, how do the 'sulphides get there .... Is it our sewerage?? ] ...................... RELATED: Why the Tamar Action Group want more done to fix the river ...................... Basically, when the tide goes out the silt sticks to the salt (flocculation) and travels down the river, but most of it never reaches Low Head nor out to sea. Rather, it simply returns on the incoming tide. [ AND has done for thousands upon thousand of years!!]...................... Further, obstructions in the tributaries and down the river including log jams, willows, jetties, groins, dikes, marinas, and rice grass, with many designed or planted to assist with the silt over the years exacerbates the problem. [ However, all that has created an ecology that has value ]...................... And further still, the Trevallyn Dam and power station, agriculture and forestry, and an utterly inadequate combined storm water and sewerage system supporting a modern and rapidly developing city delivers one of the most talked about and theorised estuary systems in the world. [ YES the legacy of 200 years of disregarding the waterway and imagining it as an OPEN SEWER]........ RELATED: What scientists say about the health of the Tamar River  ........ Conclusion: silt is difficult to manage and when exposed to oxygen without treatment, it is bad news. And unless you have an endless supply of lime to treat the soil, it is problematic to make use of the extracted resource as landfill. [ SO it is what it is and a paradigm shift is required and this nonsense goes no way towards helping a misinformed community understand that] ...................... So, day upon day, year upon year, there are yarns and calls for funding and scientific research regarding our city's major waterway. Complaints and solutions in equal measure reach fever pitch around election time, particularly for candidates in the federal and state seats of Bass where the river has been a talking point for generations.[ YES as us colonials have sown we are reaping our reward ... It was muddy ground not stony ground however]...................... RELATED: Swimming in the Tamar near Launceston may never be safe ...................... Plant more rice grass, dredge it, rake it, let more water flow, build a lake, or dam and flood it has all been mooted or tried. [ BUT never an ecologically sound rational approach ... Just a call for someone else to pay for what's not really worked before]...................... Fortunately, the Tamar Island Wetlands Reserve has been spared from development. Wetlands are the "kidneys of the sea" - they clean the river of its contaminants. [ SO? let's try facilitating that?] However, it is now easier to see tiger snakes than the settling ponds at the Tailrace with the native grasses and bullrushes reaching gigantic proportions. ..... RELATED: 'Unique and really important': The significance of the Tamar's ecosystem ...................... The ponds are used to house the silt when dredging is considered the most appropriate solution [ SO? the point??]....................... But dredging is mighty expensive and state and local governments claim they do not always have the money to spare, so we make the best of what we have - on high tide we show it off while at low tide we head anywhere but the river. [ SO? Who pays for what outcome since there is no longer the need to send stuff to MOTHER ENGLAND]...................... The best solution, as always, is natural - in an unnatural environment. [ OMG where does this come from?]...................... RELATED: Why this 144-year-old club is worried about their future ...................... When the tributaries flood and the water cascades over Trevallyn Dam, a scourer is set free going to work scrubbing the bottom of the basin and delivering the volume of water required to flush Tamar River/kanamaluka the complaints subside like the flood waters. [ YES,  attention spans of bureaucrats and time serving rent seeking 'pollies' are equal to those of nats] ...................... Alas a 2016 flood occurs once every 50 years and was mighty concerning for Invermay and surrounding floodplains and suburbs. [ YES, and the next one will breach the levy banks and then what?]...................... We should learn to understand the mud, but it will never be love [ SO??? what's not to love about a wetland with lots of wildlife?]....................... Brian Wightman is a former Tasmanian Attorney-General and school principal.

[Tandra Vale]